From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.244.22.242] (helo=mail.seranoa.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16pVs4-0006XS-00 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:54:52 +0000 Received: from seranoa.com (IDENT:andrew.dixon@[172.16.1.202]) by mail.seranoa.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g2PF2Xs10692 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:02:33 -0500 Message-ID: <3C9F38C4.510394D@seranoa.com> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:48:36 -0500 From: Andrew Dixon MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: CVS tags? References: <3C9BA0DD.B3827964@seranoa.com> <20020323112215.B13151@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Jörn Engel wrote: It > > looks like maybe "core_patch_applied" is a good one to go with. Any > > thoughts? > > You should use it if you > - have more than one device that can be partitioned or > - want to get used to the new code from the beginning. As far as the MTD device goes I'm in a pretty good spot. I put together a driver that takes two flashes, creates one device from them, and then partitions them the way I want. Then I put jffs2 onto my one BIG flash partition. And that's where I get problems. It takes a very long time to mount the jffs2 partition and I'm looking for the latest jffs2 code to try to speed things up (I recall there was some talk about long mount times a little while back). So what I'm looking for is faster jffs2 code. Also, does it matter if I grab stuff from the 2.5 branch if I'm using a 2.4 kernel? Thanks, Andy -- Andrew Dixon Software Engineer Seranoa Networks 978.897.3434 x231