From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gate.aminocom.com ([193.132.141.181] helo=aminocom.com ident=0) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16x8Hb-0006dC-00 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:20:43 +0100 Message-ID: <3CBAEF5E.A537C893@aminocom.com> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:18:54 +0100 From: Elizabeth Clarke MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Hall CC: "Linux MTD list (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Writing JFFS2 image to Nand flash References: <541025071C7AC24C84E9F82296BB9B9508051A@OPTEX1.optex.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: John Hall wrote: > > You should find a grep has them in wbuf.c. Are you setting > > CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_NAND? > Yes, CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_NAND is set. wbuf.c doesn't contain these > functions. I had grepped fs/jffs2/*.[ch] for them. Doh, helps if I read whats actually there. jffs2_flash_read_oob is a define in os-linux.h. > This is the version of wbuf.c that I have: > [john@morgan jffs2]$ cvs stat wbuf.c > =================================================================== > File: wbuf.c Status: Up-to-date > > Working revision: 1.1.2.2 > Repository revision: 1.1.2.2 /home/cvs/mtd/fs/jffs2/wbuf.c,v > Sticky Tag: jffs2-nand-branch (branch: 1.1.2) Interesting. Mine says revision 1.10. hmmm puzzled. I think I'd prompt dwmw2 for some words of wisdom.... Beth