From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gate.aminocom.com ([193.132.141.181] helo=aminocom.com ident=0) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16x90j-0006gI-00 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:07:21 +0100 Message-ID: <3CBAFA48.EE78E618@aminocom.com> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 17:05:28 +0100 From: Elizabeth Clarke MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse CC: John Hall , "Linux MTD list (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Writing JFFS2 image to Nand flash References: <3CBAEF5E.A537C893@aminocom.com> <541025071C7AC24C84E9F82296BB9B9508051A@OPTEX1.optex.local> <16668.1018886569@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: David Woodhouse wrote: > > eclarke@aminocom.com said: > > Interesting. Mine says revision 1.10. hmmm puzzled. I think I'd > > prompt dwmw2 for some words of wisdom.... Beth > > Er, didn't we abolish the jffs2_nand_branch and pull the latest code onto > the trunk? That might explain why I'm puzzled! Did you do this when I was otherwise engaged? If we did, then you did it :) Beth