From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from school.cyberec.com ([202.153.122.103]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17JsCk-0002Fu-00 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 09:49:43 +0100 Message-ID: <3D0DA13D.70803@emsoftltd.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 16:43:41 +0800 From: Jason Chan MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse CC: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Bad Block management routine for MTD NandFlash driver? References: <3D0D9DA9.6090404@emsoftltd.com> <3D0D981D.8040602@emsoftltd.com> <18852.1024302161@redhat.com> <19294.1024303310@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: David, Sorry, I don't fully understand your 2nd suggestion, 'translation layer' like the SmartMedia one. Is that means the smartmedia mtd driver already has bad block management? David Woodhouse wrote: >jason@emsoftltd.com said: > >> I trying to use EXT2 for my nandflash driver. Is that OK? >> > >No. You need _some_ kind of file system which is capable of dealing with >flash -- either a real file system directly on the flash such as JFFS2, or >a 'translation layer' like the SmartMedia one or NFTL if you really need to >use ext2 for some reason. > >-- >dwmw2 > > -- Best Regards, Jason Chan Emsoft Ltd.