* JFFS2 and bad blocks
@ 2002-12-03 10:23 simon
2002-12-03 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: simon @ 2002-12-03 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: MTD mailing list
I am using an SMC via the MTD layer. On one of the partitions I
would like to put a JFFS2 filesystem. Normally I erase the partition
and then mount it JFFS2. The problem is that if the partition has a
bad block I cannot erase or mount it. Does the bad block handling
have to be in the vendor specific nand driver ?
Cheers
Simon.
__________________________
Simon Haynes - Baydel
Phone : 44 (0) 1372 378811
Email : simon@baydel.com
__________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: JFFS2 and bad blocks
2002-12-03 10:23 JFFS2 and bad blocks simon
@ 2002-12-03 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2003-01-06 17:04 ` simon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2002-12-03 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: simon, MTD mailing list
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 11:23, simon@baydel.com wrote:
> I am using an SMC via the MTD layer. On one of the partitions I
> would like to put a JFFS2 filesystem. Normally I erase the partition
> and then mount it JFFS2. The problem is that if the partition has a
> bad block I cannot erase or mount it. Does the bad block handling
> have to be in the vendor specific nand driver ?
Please use latest MTD-CVS code.
Read http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/tech/nand.html
--
Thomas
____________________________________________________
linutronix - competence in embedded & realtime linux
http://www.linutronix.de
mail: tglx@linutronix.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: JFFS2 and bad blocks
2002-12-03 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2003-01-06 17:04 ` simon
2003-01-06 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: simon @ 2003-01-06 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: MTD mailing list; +Cc: tglx
I download the CVS stuff mid December and again today. The
hardware ran ok before and could use jffs2 without errors but as I
added files it was slow and I could not make file systems on
partitions which contained bad blocks.
The new CVS code seems to be much quicker and I can erase,
mount and copy files to my new filesystem without error. I have set
up the specific driver to do soft ecc. I noticed that when I reboot the
system and the filesystem gets mounted I get errors. The more
writes that occur the more errors I seem to get. I ran a test for a
week or so over the break which generated log files. A reboot after
this produced thousands of errors but the filesystem seemed ok.
The errors are something like
Empty flash at 0x00469ffcb ends at 0x0046a000
or
jffs2_scan_dirent_node(): Node CRC failed on node at 0x0046a7f0
read 0xffffffff calculated 0xdec8161b
I was wondering if any of you could shed any light on this.
On 3 Dec 2002, at 14:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 December 2002 11:23, simon@baydel.com wrote:
> > I am using an SMC via the MTD layer. On one of the partitions I
> > would like to put a JFFS2 filesystem. Normally I erase the partition
> > and then mount it JFFS2. The problem is that if the partition has a
> > bad block I cannot erase or mount it. Does the bad block handling
> > have to be in the vendor specific nand driver ?
>
> Please use latest MTD-CVS code.
> Read http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/tech/nand.html
>
> --
> Thomas
> ____________________________________________________
> linutronix - competence in embedded & realtime linux
> http://www.linutronix.de
> mail: tglx@linutronix.de
__________________________
Simon Haynes - Baydel
Phone : 44 (0) 1372 378811
Email : simon@baydel.com
__________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: JFFS2 and bad blocks
2003-01-06 17:04 ` simon
@ 2003-01-06 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2003-01-06 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: simon, MTD mailing list
On Monday 06 January 2003 18:04, simon@baydel.com wrote:
> I download the CVS stuff mid December and again today. The
> hardware ran ok before and could use jffs2 without errors but as I
> added files it was slow and I could not make file systems on
> partitions which contained bad blocks.
>
> The new CVS code seems to be much quicker and I can erase,
> mount and copy files to my new filesystem without error. I have set
> up the specific driver to do soft ecc. I noticed that when I reboot the
> system and the filesystem gets mounted I get errors. The more
> writes that occur the more errors I seem to get. I ran a test for a
> week or so over the break which generated log files. A reboot after
> this produced thousands of errors but the filesystem seemed ok.
>
> The errors are something like
>
> Empty flash at 0x00469ffcb ends at 0x0046a000
This happens due to NAND specific timed buffer flushing. JFFS2 fills up the
write buffer to a full page boundary with 0xff and writes out the buffer to
the chip, if you have no consecutive write within 2 seconds. This is done to
ensure, that data is written to FLASH. This fill looks like empty FLASH on
mount. So JFFS2 is wondering why there is data after the "empty" FLASH.
No reason to worry.
> or
>
> jffs2_scan_dirent_node(): Node CRC failed on node at 0x0046a7f0
> read 0xffffffff calculated 0xdec8161b
This happens, if the write buffer is not written to FLASH before you power
down your system without umount. Then the write buffer is lost and you get
this error on mount. This indicates, that you may have lost data.
> I was wondering if any of you could shed any light on this.
--
Thomas
________________________________________________________________________
linutronix - competence in embedded & realtime linux
http://www.linutronix.de
mail: tglx@linutronix.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-06 18:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-03 10:23 JFFS2 and bad blocks simon
2002-12-03 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2003-01-06 17:04 ` simon
2003-01-06 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox