From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bestroot.de ([217.160.170.131] helo=p15112267.pureserver.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19PB1v-0003br-0Q for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2003 02:00:59 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by p15112267.pureserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21D53A40C1 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 03:01:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xpc823 (pD9552356.dip.t-dialin.net [217.85.35.86]) by p15112267.pureserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B753A40C0 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 03:01:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gmx.net (unknown [10.0.0.75]) by xpc823 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABC5CECA1 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 03:01:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3EE3DC9F.3060606@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 03:02:23 +0200 From: Felix Domke MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Differently sized Flash chips List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, i have a device with one Intel E28F128J3 (16MB NOR) and one E28640J3 (8MB NOR). Is it possible to use both of them as one single device, especially a partition spanning over both of them? Currently, the first on is detected, correctly sized as 16MB, and the second one is detected. But the total size seems to be caculated by num_chip * size_of_first_chip, so the last 8MB alias to the first 8MB of the second flashrom, which is not really what i want. So, is it possible to correctly probe them? I just hardcoded the size to 0x180000, and it seems to work. But this is not really the way i want to go. Felix