From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from server.bluewater.co.nz ([203.167.251.250] helo=smtp.bluewaternz.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19QawR-0006C5-5a for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 23:53:11 +0100 Received: from benmore.bluewaternz.com ([192.168.2.3] helo=bluewatersys.com ident=gordon) by smtp.bluewaternz.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 19Qawv-0003kA-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:53:41 +1200 Message-ID: <3EE90475.5090605@bluewatersys.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:53:41 +1200 From: Gordon J Milne MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <20030612163736.CFEC.MINGFENG@linpus.com> <3EE8F5F6.7050805@bluewatersys.com> In-Reply-To: <3EE8F5F6.7050805@bluewatersys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: MRAM will kill FLASH ? List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Gordon J Milne wrote: > BTW, a recent issue of IEEE Spectrum had a good overview article on the > "new" memory technologies of MRAM, FRAM (Ferromagnetic RAM) and OUM > (Ovonic Unified Memory). It described the benefits of each and the > underlying physical principle involved. Oops, FRAM = Ferroelectric RAM, NOT ferromagnetic