From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailserv.intranet.gr ([146.124.14.106]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19QjuK-00087m-Hy for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 09:27:37 +0100 Received: from mailserv.intranet.gr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailserv.intranet.gr (8.11.7/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h5D8URD01086 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:30:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from ifaistos.intranet.gr (ifaistos.intranet.GR [146.124.20.203]) by mailserv.intranet.gr (8.11.7/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h5D8UQY01078 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:30:26 +0300 (EEST) Received: from intracom.gr (pcrnd46 [146.124.20.92]) by ifaistos.intranet.gr (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA20425 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:24:08 +0300 (EET DST) Message-ID: <3EE98AC4.9050200@intracom.gr> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:26:44 +0300 From: Pantelis Antoniou MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <3EE878A5.8040400@intracom.gr> In-Reply-To: <3EE878A5.8040400@intracom.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] Error free RO mtdblock device for NAND chips List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Well, obviously this thing will not work since I mistakenly use a block size of 512, instead of the erase size of the device as supported by the nandwrite utility. My device had no bad blocks, so everything worked by chance. Reading the NAND documentation for the JFFS2 OOB usage it states the the valid block marker is used for the first page in a block. I thought that it meant a block device block, but it appears that it is the erase block. So a new patch will be produced shortly. Regards Pantelis