From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from adsl-66-159-197-3.dslextreme.com ([66.159.197.3] helo=willie.blueskylabs.com ident=qmailr) by pentafluge.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19UrfS-0000Sd-7G for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:33:18 +0100 Message-ID: <3EF88B96.6000800@blueskylabs.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:34:14 -0700 From: Andrew Goodney MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'Infradead Org' References: <3C6BEE8B5E1BAC42905A93F13004E8AB032ABD2B@mailse01.axis.se> <5.2.1.1.0.20030624073531.00ae4780@192.168.1.10> In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20030624073531.00ae4780@192.168.1.10> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: JFFS patch List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Allen Curtis wrote: > I would be screaming a lot if we were not moving to JFFS2 ourselves. > However this will take us a few months to accomplish. If there is any > interest in JFFS and if someone is kind enough to point out the work > TBD, I will take a shot. My $0.02; It would be nice to keep JFFS around. We are using it because on our fairly slow platform, JFFS seems to be faster and gives us more usable space for a given partition size. So thanks for stepping up to the plate. -Andrew Goodney andrew@blueskylabs.com --------------------------- www.blueskylabs.com