From: Selwyn Tang <selwyn@hectrix.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Problems with DOC 2000 on 2.4.21
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:24:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F3058C8.2060404@hectrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1060093933.3861.6.camel@localhost3.localdomain>
I used the MAKEDEV script provided by the mtd from cvs to create the
various device files (/dev/mtd*, /dev/nftl*, etc.) and now I can access
my DOC2000.
But concerning the unshadowing of the DIP socket, I do have a problem.
My Intel D845BG borad seems to be unable to detect my DOC development
board (M-Sys' PCI EVB), and even dinfo.exe in DOS cannot detect it. But
in Linux, I can still access it using M-Sys's Linux driver. I wonder if
it is the shadowing problem you are talking about. Right now, I am using
a ASUS board smoothly with DOC.
Selwyn
Roger wrote:
> On both of my 440BX boards, Intel incorporated a shadow feature which
> shadows the mtd devices (bios chip/DIP socket) from the normal mtd
> drivers/modules.
>
> I have to utilize the openbios/devbios module/code to unshadow the 440BX
> DIP socket.
>
> There are many other chipsets supported for unshadowing in that code. I
> believe the code only needs to be implemented into mtd somehow.
>
> But basically, I get nothing found in dmesg when loading the DOC modules
> and nothing showing in /proc/mtd* -- but mtdchar does show some info in
> the /proc/mtd* files.
>
> After unshadowing the 440BX DIP socket (using openbios/devbios -- i
> hacked module to leave the DIP socket unshadowed after unloading;-), and
> then loading the mtd/doc modules, I get 'found DOC ...' in dmesg and I
> get good info in the /proc/mtd* files.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-06 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-04 10:08 Problems with DOC 2000 on 2.4.21 Selwyn Tang
2003-08-04 10:23 ` Roger
[not found] ` <3F2E38FE.8030800@hectrix.com>
2003-08-05 14:32 ` Roger
2003-08-06 1:24 ` Selwyn Tang [this message]
2003-08-06 7:55 ` Roger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F3058C8.2060404@hectrix.com \
--to=selwyn@hectrix.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox