From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.134.130.80] (helo=pip5.mpl.ch) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19nHJz-0003o1-Ne for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:35:15 +0100 Message-ID: <3F3B81FD.1010205@elsoft.ch> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:35:09 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IkRhdmlkIE3DvGxsZXIgKEVMU09GVCBBRyki?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse References: <3F3B75AA.6050701@elsoft.ch> <1060861648.3152.70.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> <3F3B7D66.5030907@elsoft.ch> <1060863668.3152.72.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1060863668.3152.72.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: JFFS2 internals question List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 13:15, "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote: > >>David Woodhouse wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 12:42, "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Is it true that the read calls emitted from the JFFS2 code to the MTD HW >>>>driver do not cross NAND block boundries (nand_read_ecc() has its start >>>>and end point of reading in the same NAND block)? >>> >>> >>>I'd first like to know why you think you need the answer to this... :) >>> >> >>I need it to test a theory. > > > I think we do make read calls which cross a page boundary, yes. > Sorry, i was talking about block boundary, not page boundary. Or is it just a typo? Dave