From: Alice Hennessy <ahennessy@mvista.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Different nand interface
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 13:17:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F9D8B54.FFB44876@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1067288106.16391.5.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk
David Woodhouse wrote:
> What is wrong with your mail user agent? It's customary to wrap lines at
> seventy-something characters; not to wrap them at 90 then again at 70,
> giving alternate 70-char and 20-char lines... :)
>
> On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 12:43 -0800, Alice Hennessy wrote:
> > The hardware logic uses register access for special commands.
> > Readid,
> > status does
> > 2 writes to a register, one for address (to distinquish which flash),
> > one for
> > command and one more
> > to read. Erase takes 2 writes to a register, address then command.
> > The
> > out-of-band access
> > uses a register to give a command and then the out-of-band data is
> > read using
> >
> > readb with offset.
>
> That's just bizarre. I don't think I want to ask _why_ they did this.
>
> You may be able to massage this into the generic NAND code; you can
> override nand_command() completely. I suspect you won't be using much of
> the generic code if you do that though. You might end up just writing a
> standalone driver.
>
> --
> dwmw2
I'll try to fix the email thing :-)
Thanks for the quick response. I'll weigh the massage effort with any
future maintenance effort saved.
Alice
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-27 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-23 21:33 Different nand interface Alice Hennessy
2003-10-24 1:36 ` Joshua Wise
2003-10-24 7:39 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-24 7:41 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-27 18:25 ` Alice Hennessy
2003-10-27 20:00 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-27 20:43 ` Alice Hennessy
2003-10-27 20:55 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-27 21:17 ` Alice Hennessy [this message]
2003-10-27 22:29 ` David Woodhouse
2003-11-12 0:49 ` Alice Hennessy
2003-11-18 22:26 ` Alice Hennessy
2003-10-25 7:29 ` Charles Manning
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F9D8B54.FFB44876@mvista.com \
--to=ahennessy@mvista.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox