From: Chris Ellec <cellec@celerity.net>
To: linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: jffs2 vs NFTL
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:14:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FA0119A.9020003@celerity.net> (raw)
A couple years ago I developped a system wih DOC using [N]FTL and an
ext2 file system which was working fine.
Now I have a new project where we'll use JFFS2 for reliability instead
of ext2, but I am confused as to the relationship between JFFS2 and NFTL.
For example the help provided in the Configuration steps says that
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS is not needed for Diskonchip, however
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/tech/nand.html
says that the same flag is needed for JFFS2
Does that mean that the JFFS2 driver does not use the NFTL driver ? What
about the new chips that need the INFTL driver ?
Chris.
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-29 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-29 19:14 Chris Ellec [this message]
2003-10-30 11:52 ` jffs2 vs NFTL David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FA0119A.9020003@celerity.net \
--to=cellec@celerity.net \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox