From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158] helo=av.mvista.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22 #5 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1AMENu-0001pC-QY for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:31:47 +0000 Sender: ahennessy@mvista.com Message-ID: <3FBA9C88.1D213181@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:26:16 -0800 From: Alice Hennessy MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <3F984931.E6409ED7@mvista.com> <1066981292.29915.584.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <3F9D6328.547A39A6@mvista.com> <1067284806.16241.2.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> <3F9D8384.ABC9FD4@mvista.com> <1067288106.16391.5.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> <3FB18390.3846C928@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Different nand interface List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Alice Hennessy wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 13:17 -0800, Alice Hennessy wrote: > > > Thanks for the quick response. I'll weigh the massage effort with any > > > future maintenance effort saved. > > > > Bear in mind I'm happy enough to make changes to the generic NAND > > interface if they're going to be useful in general. > > > > -- > > dwmw2 > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ > > I've attached the current driver for review, possibly as a standalone > driver. As you can > see from the patch, the current placement of the driver is in the > drivers/mtd/nand > directory and it replaces the generic nand.c if configured to the > customized board. > This was to make use of nand_ecc.c and nand_ids.c. Also, the supporting > files > stw_flash.h and stw_flash.c are currently under the board's directories > but can be massaged to > go anywhere necessary. This board's nand flash, as I've stated in > previous emails, > has a completely different hardware interface than the standard nand flash > and this makes > using the generic nand.c difficult. Any opinions on how this fits in > would be appreciated. > > Alice > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hi, Are there any objections or opinions on adding this driver ? Alice