From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] UBI: Make MTD_UBI_FASTMAP non-experimental
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:01:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f8d0417-5e7d-b7c8-ba83-9a87e774f97f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <434195d8-d638-240d-8d63-50d033ea453a@nod.at>
On 03/29/2017 10:04 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Jesper,
>
> Am 29.03.2017 um 17:38 schrieb Jesper Nilsson:
>> MTD_UBI_FASTMAP has been set as experimental since it
>> was merged back in 2012.
>>
>> There hasn't been much change in the format,
>> so we can consider the feature stable and start
>> being careful about breaking the format.
>> (This is somewhat of a pre-requisite for anyone actually
>> using the feature in the real world and depending on it)
>>
>> Drop the experimental note and the warning text about
>> the on-flash format not being finalized.
>
> I fully agree, we can drop this note. But we have to add another
> one.
> While Fastmap is a nice feature to speed-up the attach time it
> comes with a cost. It makes UBI less robust. I saw issues
> on NAND chips which misbehaved slightly where UBI was able to
> recover when using a full scan but not when Fastmap was used.
> The UBI full scan code is paranoid and can sort out problems
> very early, with Fastmap enabled you lose this valuable property.
>
> So, users should enable Fastmap only when they absolutely need
> a very fast attach time and be very sure that the NAND works as
> expected.
So we should document this with a big fat warning and set fastmap to
default=n ?
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-29 15:38 [RFC][PATCH] UBI: Make MTD_UBI_FASTMAP non-experimental Jesper Nilsson
2017-03-29 20:04 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-03-30 10:01 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2017-03-30 17:39 ` Jesper Nilsson
2017-03-30 21:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-03-31 21:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Jesper Nilsson
2017-04-03 11:17 ` [RFC][PATCH] " Jesper Nilsson
2017-05-09 7:46 ` Jesper Nilsson
2017-05-09 8:53 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f8d0417-5e7d-b7c8-ba83-9a87e774f97f@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox