From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158] helo=av.mvista.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #5 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ao9MG-0005MS-0J for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:49:28 +0000 Sender: ahennessy@mvista.com Message-ID: <402023A4.C2AF8E2E@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 14:41:41 -0800 From: Alice Hennessy MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse References: <4018514D.6E4DB38A@mvista.com> <401FEA03.7DCCA6F5@mvista.com> <1075847401.786.3961.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: andrzej_mialkowski@o2.pl cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: gen probe.c issue List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 10:35 -0800, Alice Hennessy wrote: > > I believe it's ok to set up partitions for a flash and not have all the flash visible. Perhaps > > a better way to do this would be to just make another partition and make the protected part > > read only. But I believe not making the whole flash visible is also acceptable. > > BTW, I don't use redboot partitioning with this flash. > > > > David, if you think it's bad practice, I will change my mapping file instead. > > I'd very much prefer to show the chip driver the whole chip and > partition it appropriately, yes please. > > -- > dwmw2 Will do. Alice