From: David Vrabel <dvrabel@arcom.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Erasebug on AMD flashes
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:25:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4059790D.4020904@arcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403172051.22120.dk.dbox2@gmx.net>
dkey wrote:
>
> we are using jffs2 on the dbox2 and AMD flash chips, but since rev. 1.96 of
> cfi_cmdset_0002.c we can't erase the flashes. rev. 1.94 works without
> problems.
"since 1.96" doesn't make sense. Any breakage would be from 1.95.
> here are some debug infos, tell me if you need more!
Part numbers of the flash chips and their configuration (interleaved etc.).
> would be please if anybody can take a look over the code or revert revision of
> cfi_cmdset_0002.c to 1.94.
There's no reason why you can't revert to 1.94 yourself.
FWIW, I'm now of the opinion that chip_status() is definately broken for
interleaved chips and probably cannot be made to work without ending up
with a mess.
I would suggest using the data polling algorithm instead (where applicable).
Also, ignoring the internal flash timeout (DQ5 toggling) and instead
relying on the software timeout might be acceptable. However, a
repeatedly suspended erase keeps getting its software timeout extended
and thus there is a possibility of the software timeout never occuring.
Hmmm. An internal timeout requires a chip reset and thus we can't
actually suspend an internally timed-out erase so the software timeout
won't be extended.
David Vrabel
--
David Vrabel, Design Engineer
Arcom, Clifton Road Tel: +44 (0)1223 411200 ext. 3233
Cambridge CB1 7EA, UK Web: http://www.arcom.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-18 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-17 19:51 Erasebug on AMD flashes dkey
2004-03-17 22:39 ` Shawn Jin
2004-03-18 10:25 ` David Vrabel [this message]
[not found] <E1B3wBv-0005HA-9d@pentafluge.infradead.org>
2004-03-18 22:02 ` dkey
2004-03-19 10:20 ` David Vrabel
2004-03-19 12:27 ` Re[2]: " barthezz
2004-03-22 10:41 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4059790D.4020904@arcom.com \
--to=dvrabel@arcom.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox