public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <dvrabel@arcom.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Erasebug on AMD flashes
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:25:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4059790D.4020904@arcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403172051.22120.dk.dbox2@gmx.net>

dkey wrote:
> 
> we are using jffs2 on the dbox2 and AMD flash chips, but since rev. 1.96 of 
> cfi_cmdset_0002.c we can't erase the flashes. rev. 1.94 works without 
> problems.

"since 1.96" doesn't make sense.  Any breakage would be from 1.95.

> here are some debug infos, tell me if you need more!

Part numbers of the flash chips and their configuration (interleaved etc.).

> would be please if anybody can take a look over the code or revert revision of 
> cfi_cmdset_0002.c to 1.94.

There's no reason why you can't revert to 1.94 yourself.

FWIW, I'm now of the opinion that chip_status() is definately broken for 
interleaved chips and probably cannot be made to work without ending up 
with a mess.

I would suggest using the data polling algorithm instead (where applicable).

Also, ignoring the internal flash timeout (DQ5 toggling) and instead 
relying on the software timeout might be acceptable.  However, a 
repeatedly suspended erase keeps getting its software timeout extended 
and thus there is a possibility of the software timeout never occuring. 
  Hmmm.  An internal timeout requires a chip reset and thus we can't 
actually suspend an internally timed-out erase so the software timeout 
won't be extended.

David Vrabel
-- 
David Vrabel, Design Engineer

Arcom, Clifton Road           Tel: +44 (0)1223 411200 ext. 3233
Cambridge CB1 7EA, UK         Web: http://www.arcom.com/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-18 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-17 19:51 Erasebug on AMD flashes dkey
2004-03-17 22:39 ` Shawn Jin
2004-03-18 10:25 ` David Vrabel [this message]
     [not found] <E1B3wBv-0005HA-9d@pentafluge.infradead.org>
2004-03-18 22:02 ` dkey
2004-03-19 10:20   ` David Vrabel
2004-03-19 12:27     ` Re[2]: " barthezz
2004-03-22 10:41       ` David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4059790D.4020904@arcom.com \
    --to=dvrabel@arcom.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox