From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1.cray.com ([136.162.0.111]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #5 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1B3y21-0005xC-9z for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:57:57 +0000 Received: from relaya.us.cray.com (relaya.us.cray.com [192.168.252.144]) i2IDvsFj012515 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:57:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from orchid.us.cray.com (orchid.us.cray.com [172.30.27.91]) i2IDvqdM022976 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:57:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from cray.com (troll [192.168.250.5])i2IDvpSv4126112 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:57:52 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4059AADF.50902@cray.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:57:51 -0600 From: David Updegraff MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: large page NAND List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi. There was a post or two a few months ago about support for larger (1,2,?,K) pagesize and the extra 2 bytes of config available in newer NAND chips.. And a cautionary about asking for advice before proceeding. Is there followup/progress on that front that I have missed? We are looking into these needs for some Samsung 2k-page NANDs. Advice & recommended directions appreciated. -dbu. Dave Updegraff / Cray, Inc.