From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pacific.moreton.com.au ([203.143.235.130] helo=dorfl.internal.moreton.com.au) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #5 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1B9CKO-0002GZ-JR for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 01:14:33 +0100 Message-ID: <406CB05B.5030000@snapgear.com> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 10:14:19 +1000 From: Greg Ungerer MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse References: <1080830176.24117.1858.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1080830176.24117.1858.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Kalev Lember cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Bad blocks List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 17:06 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: >>I am going to use DOC Millennium Plus and I do not want to use M-Systems >>propietary kernel modules. >>Having read the mailing list archives I have some questions. Does current >>INFTL code support bad block handling? Without that I would say it is >>virtually useless. Am I correct? > > > It doesn't, and you're probably correct, yes. > > This is fairly high up on my TODO list but keeps getting preempted by > RealWork(tm). Are you volunteering? It shouldn't be too hard. Yeah, high on my todo list as well. But I am not going to get to it any time soon. It should be quite simple to do. Regards Greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greg Ungerer -- Chief Software Dude EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com SnapGear -- a CyberGuard Company PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888 825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630 Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com