From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.imc-berlin.de ([217.110.46.186] helo=mail.berlin.imc-berlin.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #5 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1BBFfu-000872-Rz for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 17:13:14 +0100 Received: from mailgate.berlin.imc-berlin.de (mailgate.berlin.imc-berlin.de [10.0.0.13])i37FP1j9012532 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:25:02 +0200 Received: from imc-berlin.de (scholz.berlin.imc-berlin.de [10.0.2.10]) by mailgate.berlin.imc-berlin.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA17598 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 18:13:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de) Message-ID: <4074287A.8070501@imc-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 18:12:42 +0200 From: Steven Scholz MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "'linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org'" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: kernel oops in cfi_cmdset_0002.c:do_write_one()... List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Steven Blakeslee wrote: > I just debugged something like this ealier. There are timeout values that > need to be increased for slow access. But still the system should not crash like this in case of an timeout (maybe cause by an old flash), don't you think? I guess somethings wrong with the waitqueue chip->wq ... > } else { >... > chip->state = FL_READY; > wake_up(&chip->wq); > cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex); > DISABLE_VPP(map); > ... Steven Scholz