From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.imc-berlin.de ([217.110.46.186] helo=mail.berlin.imc-berlin.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #5 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1BBZbC-0003aw-DS for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 14:29:42 +0100 Received: from mailgate.berlin.imc-berlin.de (mailgate.berlin.imc-berlin.de [10.0.0.13])i38CfTj9019992 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:41:29 +0200 Received: from imc-berlin.de (scholz.berlin.imc-berlin.de [10.0.2.10]) by mailgate.berlin.imc-berlin.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA29916 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:29:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de) Message-ID: <407553A5.5010702@imc-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:29:09 +0200 From: Steven Scholz MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "'linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org'" References: <40742192.5030901@imc-berlin.de> <1081354787.4799.191.camel@tubarao> In-Reply-To: <1081354787.4799.191.camel@tubarao> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: kernel oops in cfi_cmdset_0002.c:do_write_one()... List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Thayne Harbaugh wrote: > On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 09:43, Steven Scholz wrote: > >>Hi there, >> >>on my embedded PPC system with linux-2.425 I have two flash devices. > > >>Warning: DQ5 raised while program operation was in progress, however operation completed OK >>Warning: DQ5 raised while program operation was in progress, however operation completed OK >>Warning: DQ5 raised while program operation was in progress, however operation completed OK >>Waiting for write to complete timed out in do_write_oneword. > > > These error messages are from an ancient version of cfi_cmdset_0002.c. > They come from over-efficient software design that didn't consider the > quirks of how a flash chip works. Have you tried a recent version? I just notice that in my old 2.4.20 kernel tree I have a * $Id: cfi_cmdset_0002.c,v 1.67 2003/04/15 22:32:13 thayne Exp $ and in a _new_ 2.4.25 tree I have * $Id: cfi_cmdset_0002.c,v 1.62 2003/01/24 23:30:13 dwmw2 Exp $ How could that be !?!? Is the MTD code not pushed up into the main kernel sources??? Steven -- Steven Scholz imc Measurement & Control imc Meßsysteme GmbH Voltastr. 5 Voltastr. 5 13355 Berlin 13355 Berlin Germany Deutschland