From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.170.72.194] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1BbGdw-0007dZ-Bz for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:30:45 -0400 Message-ID: <40D2C445.6010402@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:30:29 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <002301c45340$7e44ffc0$e100a8c0@ycigrnd.ycig.com> In-Reply-To: <002301c45340$7e44ffc0$e100a8c0@ycigrnd.ycig.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: leeyang Subject: Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Is it possible to reduce GC blocks List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , leeyang wrote: > I am kind of short of flash space in my board. > 2M total 64k per block > loader 1 block > kernel 11 blocks,mtd > initrd 14 blocks,mtd ramdisk > configuration section have 6 blocks only with jffs2 > but GC will take 5 of 6,only 1 blocks for data! > > Is it possible to release 1 or 2 block from gc? > Critical parameters may be tuned by hacking jffs2_calc_trigger_levels() (build.c). You may try this. -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.