From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.170.72.194] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Bpi83-0001BX-Ee for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:41:35 -0400 Received: from yandex.ru (sauron.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.37.21]) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749F4229D1 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:41:00 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <41074A7C.9020808@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:41:00 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <410653C0.3070609@yandex.ru> <1090934568.20889.162.camel@thomas.tec.linutronix.de> <41066966.8070107@yandex.ru> <1090949508.20889.169.camel@thomas.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <1090949508.20889.169.camel@thomas.tec.linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: bugreport List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 16:40, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: > proc support was removed in meantime (current CVS). Oh, sorry, my snapshot was deprecated. Note, the same thing should also be fixed in super-v24.c. Just interesting, why the proc interface was removed? Have you added ioctl interface? My JFFS2 CVS snapshot of 15 Jul 2004 has no ioctl interface. > But anyway thanks for pointing this out Not at all. -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.