From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 42.242.232.72.static.reverse.layeredtech.com ([72.232.242.42] helo=secure.poehali.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HsNzP-0003i6-96 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 27 May 2007 15:01:20 -0400 Message-ID: <41348.127.0.0.1.1180292470.squirrel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070527200853.3caf8206@dhcp-255-175.norway.atmel.com> References: <465431DA.5030500@atmel.com> <1179992308.13101.16.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> <46558893.1020802@comcast.net> <1180010988.13101.103.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> <012d01c79e06$66823470$3204200a@head.local> <20070524164654.3f106ead@newbox> <20070524181437.01550127@newbox> <20070527200853.3caf8206@dhcp-255-175.norway.atmel.com> Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 22:01:10 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Re: Some issues with the AT91 dataflash driver... From: "Ivan Kuten" To: "Haavard Skinnemoen" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: david-b@pacbell.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Vadim Yatsenko List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > Looks to me like something more fundamental got broken. I'm using > mtd_dataflash with the atmel_spi driver. I take it you're using > at91_dataflash with the legacy AT91 SPI driver, right? > Correct I'm using at91_dataflash and legacy SPI on 2.6.22rc1+maxim patches. Better say trying to use :-) BR, Ivan