From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <abityuckiy@yandex.ru>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: inode checkpoints
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 17:46:10 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41615422.8060909@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1096895892.30942.614.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
>>I think the checkpoints shouldn't be created by GC (when it is actually
>>garbage collecting) because of it will decrease the JFFS2 performance.
>>GC is called on some write request when there is no space (excluding the
>>situation when it is called in background by the GC thread). This, it is
>>bad to load GC by additional work of creating checkpoints since it is
>>long enough process....
>>
>>What do you think?
>
>
> Hmmm. Maybe. But we can write a checkpoint node when we GC a previous
> checkpoint node perhaps? And we can still write checkpoint nodes when
> appropriate from the actual JFFS2 write routines.
>
I have the following reasons why it is bad to include checkpoint
writings when garbage collecting:
1. If there is no (or few) space and the GC is called, it is better to
*obsolete* checkpoints, not to create new ones. :-) So, if there are no
threads, I don't know how to create checkpoints from GC... In this case
it is better to create them while writing... But this is additional
delay for write operations...
So, I propose either:
1. Introduce the option which enables the checkpoint support and
automatically enables the GC thread.
2. Just use distinct thread for checkpoints.
Do you have other ideas?
--
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-04 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-04 10:14 inode checkpoints Artem Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 10:22 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-04 10:36 ` [OBORONA-SPAM] " Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 12:34 ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-04 13:07 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 13:18 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-04 13:32 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 13:46 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy [this message]
2004-10-04 14:18 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 14:23 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-04 15:07 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-05 14:07 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-05 16:45 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-05 17:20 ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-06 9:07 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 11:45 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 11:58 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 13:01 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 14:48 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 13:22 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 11:44 ` Artem Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 12:36 ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-04 12:43 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-04 13:26 ` [OBORONA-SPAM] " Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 13:39 ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-04 13:56 ` Artem Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 14:06 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 14:17 ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-04 14:22 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41615422.8060909@yandex.ru \
--to=abityuckiy@yandex.ru \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox