public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <abityuckiy@yandex.ru>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: inode checkpoints
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 17:46:10 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41615422.8060909@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1096895892.30942.614.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>

>>I think the checkpoints shouldn't be created by GC (when it is actually 
>>garbage collecting) because of it will decrease the JFFS2 performance. 
>>GC is called on some write request when there is no space (excluding the 
>>situation when it is called in background by the GC thread). This, it is 
>>bad to load GC by additional work of creating checkpoints since it is 
>>long enough process....
>>
>>What do you think?
> 
> 
> Hmmm. Maybe. But we can write a checkpoint node when we GC a previous
> checkpoint node perhaps? And we can still write checkpoint nodes when
> appropriate from the actual JFFS2 write routines.
> 
I have the following reasons why it is bad to include checkpoint 
writings when garbage collecting:

1. If there is no (or few) space and the GC is called, it is better to 
*obsolete* checkpoints, not to create new ones. :-) So, if there are no 
threads, I don't know how to create checkpoints from GC... In this case 
it is better to create them while writing... But this is additional 
delay for write operations...

So, I propose either:
1. Introduce the option which enables the checkpoint support and 
automatically enables the GC thread.
2. Just use distinct thread for checkpoints.

Do you have other ideas?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-04 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-04 10:14 inode checkpoints Artem Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 10:22 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-04 10:36   ` [OBORONA-SPAM] " Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 12:34     ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-04 13:07       ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 13:18         ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-04 13:32           ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 13:46           ` Artem B. Bityuckiy [this message]
2004-10-04 14:18           ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 14:23             ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-04 15:07               ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-05 14:07               ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-05 16:45                 ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-05 17:20                   ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-06  9:07                     ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 11:45                     ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 11:58                       ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 13:01                       ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 14:48                         ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-09 13:22                       ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 11:44   ` Artem Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 12:36     ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-04 12:43       ` David Woodhouse
2004-10-04 13:26       ` [OBORONA-SPAM] " Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 13:39         ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-04 13:56           ` Artem Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 14:06             ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2004-10-04 14:17               ` Josh Boyer
2004-10-04 14:22                 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41615422.8060909@yandex.ru \
    --to=abityuckiy@yandex.ru \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox