From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [213.170.72.194] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru)
	by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1CETUF-0007qK-Ir
	for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:06:49 -0400
Message-ID: <416158D4.4050903@yandex.ru>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:06:12 +0400
From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <abityuckiy@yandex.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dedekind@oktetlabs.ru
References: <416122A1.4060302@oktetlabs.ru>		<1096885344.30942.559.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>		<4161379C.3070109@oktetlabs.ru>		<1096893405.22034.9.camel@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com>		<41614F6B.6050802@yandex.ru>	<1096897195.22034.23.camel@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com>
	<4161568D.3060605@oktetlabs.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4161568D.3060605@oktetlabs.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: inode checkpoints
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

Sorry:
> But I believe the NOR ICPs shouldn't be implemented together with NAND 
> ICPs since NOR ICPs are much simpler. For example, they need much simpler 
> data structures, algorithms, etc. I don't think it is a good idea to have 
> hunderds of #ifdefs ... It's better to implement NOR ICPs as distinct thing...
 > Don't you think so?


-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.