From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [202.202.0.36] (helo=cqu.edu.cn) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1KJK0S-0004hG-RQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:18:13 +0000 Message-ID: <416264428.20337@cqu.edu.cn> Subject: Re: [PATCH][UBI]:Remove the prot tree from the WL unit From: xiaochuan-xu To: dedekind@infradead.org In-Reply-To: <1216219840.29469.81.camel@sauron> References: <1216214483.2782.91.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1216217566.29469.62.camel@sauron> <1216218027.2782.97.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1216218036.29469.64.camel@sauron> <1216218971.2782.112.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1216219840.29469.81.camel@sauron> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:17:42 +0800 Message-Id: <1216264662.2781.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Artem, On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 17:50 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > Sure, this is an intermediate state. Your next patches should fix > this. We just removed the protection tree separately because it > is an independed step and it will make further patches simpler > to review and understand. I believe the next patch should modify the used tree, i.e., adding the @tempr element to @struct ubi_wl_entry and some relative sentences. Of course, a used tree special function refer to as @wl_used_tree_add() is in need. What do you think? -- yours Sincerely, xiaochuan-xu (许小川)