From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.170.72.194] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1CKXPW-0003yW-OR for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 03:30:59 -0400 Received: from [192.168.37.21] (sauron.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.37.21]) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEE0229CF for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:30:26 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <41776592.7020100@yandex.ru> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:30:26 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <41767593.9030004@inf.u-szeged.hu> In-Reply-To: <41767593.9030004@inf.u-szeged.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: JFFS2 mount time - more List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ferenc, I have 3 more questions. 1. How large are your summary nodes (in average) for blocks full of dirents/nodes ? 2. Why do not you use compression for them? 3. Why did you introduce new tool instead of just adding new options to the mkfs.jffs2 ? -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.