From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.170.72.194] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1CQ2dX-0004M4-D9 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 06:52:15 -0500 Message-ID: <418B693C.1000102@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 14:51:24 +0300 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Estelle HAMMACHE References: <417F961A.1090107@yandex.ru> <1098881953.13633.1786.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <417FA408.9080906@yandex.ru> <1098884706.13633.1791.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <4180E732.70608@yandex.ru> <4180FAD8.2000107@yandex.ru> <41879A58.F960F963@st.com> <41890762.9030901@yandex.ru> <4189F07F.6495F568@st.com> <4189F823.2060204@yandex.ru> <418A591C.A4D46C9E@st.com> <418A643B.2070806@yandex.ru> <418B42AF.4457A6FD@st.com> In-Reply-To: <418B42AF.4457A6FD@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: JFFS2 & SMP List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Estelle HAMMACHE wrote: > Artem, > > you are right of course. The patch I proposed would only make sense > in a very specific environment which is very different from the > way JFFS2 and linux work. So you can forget about my previous message. > I guess there is no way around using a mutex. > > Estelle > Thanks for discussion. -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.