From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <abityuckiy@yandex.ru>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: one more field in raw_node_ref ?
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:34:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41986A21.6040605@yandex.ru> (raw)
Hello guys,
I would be happy to know your opinions about to introduce one more
32-bit field to the node_ref structure in the JFFS2. Is this really bad?
This means to increase the memory needed for in-core structures on 25%
:-( I know, it sucks, but this would really simplify and improve the
checkpoints processing...
Opinions?
Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.
next reply other threads:[~2004-11-15 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-15 8:34 Artem B. Bityuckiy [this message]
2004-11-15 8:46 ` one more field in raw_node_ref ? David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41986A21.6040605@yandex.ru \
--to=abityuckiy@yandex.ru \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox