From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [192.58.210.9] (helo=crl-mailb.crl.dec.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1CpRnR-0001BY-F0 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:47:26 -0500 Message-ID: <41E7CD50.1020003@hp.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:46:56 -0500 From: Jamey Hicks MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" References: <20050111215102.GA6289@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20050113151724.GB18864@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20050113154037.GC18864@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1105631350.26551.204.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <20050113161302.GD18864@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: MTD List , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: JFFS3 & performance List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: > Design makes sence, patches makes more sence, running our test > different platforms makes even more sence. :-) Now we have only > x86/ARM results. Need more... > I'm running jffs2 on blackfin uClinux I could run jffs3. What kind of test results are you looking for? Jamey