From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1.asianet.co.th ([203.144.222.229] helo=mail.asianet.co.th) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Cu0Vo-0004mB-QH for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:40:07 -0500 Received: from virscan1.asianet.co.th (HELO mail.asianet.co.th) ([203.144.222.197]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.asianet.co.th (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jan 2005 10:39:57 +0700 Received: from ppp-210.86.146.220.revip.asianet.co.th (HELO [10.1.1.33]) ([2 10.86.146.220])(envelope-sender )by mx1.asianet.co.th ( qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTPfor ; 27 Jan 2005 10:39:37 +0700 Message-ID: <41F8627B.1060809@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:39:39 +0700 From: Pathompong Puengrostham MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: AM29LV800BB not detected by jedec_probe List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, My board has 1 AM29LV800BB chip in 16-bit mode with 16-bit buswidth. jedec_probe v 1.61 cannot detect it but v 1.51 can. After I commented out the line in finfo_uaddr() that force the unlock addresses to be 8-bit mode, it detected the chip and ran just fine. Has anybody experienced this? Best regards, Pathompong Puengrostham