From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ext-proxy-2.ftel.co.uk ([192.65.220.98]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1CuCEb-0000xM-VT for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:11:07 -0500 Message-ID: <41F9127E.6030508@mesias.co.uk> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:10:38 +0000 From: Cam MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= References: <20050126205121.11236.qmail@web52705.mail.yahoo.com> <1106775037.6955.50.camel@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> <1106819251.783.141.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <20050127131702.GA22121@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20050127131702.GA22121@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse Subject: Re: JFFS3 document / wiki [OT] List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jörn > Plus, Wikis tend to be instant security problems. The situation > appears to be so bad that anyone with average exploit knowledge can > read the sources and control some new machines within a rainy > afternoon. Can you back that statement up with an example please? I wasn't aware that wikis were so dangerous! :) I run a wiki which had some problems with spam but it didn't go beyond that, and I've never heard of a wiki that caused security problems. IMHO they provide a reasonable compromise between high security and good features. -Cam -- camilo@mesias.co.uk <--