From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailer.cse.iitd.ac.in ([202.141.68.3] helo=desh.cse.iitd.ernet.in) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1D3EP5-00009p-Bh for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:19:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4219EDC3.1060506@kritikalsolutions.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:48:43 +0530 From: Narinder Kumar MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dedekind@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <4219E20F.80908@kritikalsolutions.com> <1108994310.13420.50.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <1108994310.13420.50.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: mkfs.jffs2 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi , First of all thanx for the reply . I am using AT45DB642 NAND Flash and it seems to have erase block of 0x420 i,e 1056 bytes. and when i have created my MTD partitions i have specified the partition sizes to be multiple of these eraseblock sizes in drivers/at91/mtd/at91_dataflash.c , My 3 partitions are 4*1024*1056 (4 GB) , 3*1024*1056 (3 GB) and 1*1024*1056 (1 GB) Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: >On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 18:58 +0530, Narinder Kumar wrote: > > >>mkfs.jffs2 -e 0x420 -d /tmp/Application >> >> > >0x420 is strange size. I believe it is wrong, try to look at your Flash >specification closer. > > > >. > > >