* SUMMARY for JFFS2? @ 2005-02-28 14:19 Steven Scholz 2005-03-03 11:58 ` Ferenc Havasi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Steven Scholz @ 2005-02-28 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mtd Hi there, IIUC then the SUMMARY stuff goes into JFFS3. But are there any plans to officially include it into the JFFS2 code? It's quite cumbersome to update MTD CVS and then merge the patch http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/jffs2/jffs2-summary-20050211.patch by hand. Since its a compile time option is there anything speaking against such inclusion? Thanks! -- Steven ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: SUMMARY for JFFS2? 2005-02-28 14:19 SUMMARY for JFFS2? Steven Scholz @ 2005-03-03 11:58 ` Ferenc Havasi 2005-04-14 9:15 ` Steven Scholz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Ferenc Havasi @ 2005-03-03 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mtd; +Cc: Steven Scholz Steven Scholz wrote: > IIUC then the SUMMARY stuff goes into JFFS3. > But are there any plans to officially include it into the JFFS2 code? > > It's quite cumbersome to update MTD CVS and then merge the patch > http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/jffs2/jffs2-summary-20050211.patch by hand. > > Since its a compile time option is there anything speaking against such > inclusion? If David (dwmw2) says yes, we are ready to commit. Due to Steven's and some other people testing I think now it is stable. Regards, Ferenc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: SUMMARY for JFFS2? 2005-03-03 11:58 ` Ferenc Havasi @ 2005-04-14 9:15 ` Steven Scholz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Steven Scholz @ 2005-04-14 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mtd Ferenc Havasi wrote: > Steven Scholz wrote: > >> IIUC then the SUMMARY stuff goes into JFFS3. >> But are there any plans to officially include it into the JFFS2 code? >> >> It's quite cumbersome to update MTD CVS and then merge the patch >> http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/jffs2/jffs2-summary-20050211.patch by hand. >> >> Since its a compile time option is there anything speaking against >> such inclusion? > > > If David (dwmw2) says yes, we are ready to commit. Due to Steven's and > some other people testing I think now it is stable. David? Are you going to say yes? Or will summary for JFFS2 stay a seperate patch forever? -- Steven ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-14 9:15 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-02-28 14:19 SUMMARY for JFFS2? Steven Scholz 2005-03-03 11:58 ` Ferenc Havasi 2005-04-14 9:15 ` Steven Scholz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox