From: Estelle HAMMACHE <estelle.hammache@st.com>
To: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <dedekind@yandex.ru>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: atomic file operations
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:59:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4242AB96.8D95936D@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 42429C1C.8050600@yandex.ru
Hi Artem,
"Artem B. Bityuckiy" wrote:
>
> Estelle HAMMACHE wrote:
> > Yes, when I write that the input buffer is split it means that
> > several data nodes are written to the flash - each data node
> > is an independent piece of data complete with header and CRC.
> > If a data node is only partly written to flash, its CRC check
> > will fail so the partial data will not be taken into account
> > when building the file at next mount. In this sense each data
> > node is an atomic write - but JFFS2 does not guarantee that
> > a write() input buffer will be written as a single data node.
>
> But if you:
>
> 1. write only 0-PAGE_SIZE bytes;
> 2. do not overlap n*PAGE_SIZE borders (n is 1,2, ...)
> 3. do fsync after write.
>
> then you have the guarantee that you either have written all or
> nowthing. JFFS2 does guarantee that due to its implementation.
This is not what I understand from jffs2_write_inode_range.
When you reach the end of the block your data may be split at
any offset because jffs2_reserve_space may return more than
JFFS2_MIN_DATA_LEN but less than the data size (or not enough
space to compress the whole input buffer if you use compression).
Or is there some trick here that I don't understand ??
bye
Estelle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-24 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-22 21:57 atomic file operations Sergei Sharonov
2005-03-23 9:39 ` Estelle HAMMACHE
2005-03-23 20:50 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-03-24 10:11 ` Estelle HAMMACHE
2005-03-24 10:53 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-24 11:59 ` Estelle HAMMACHE [this message]
2005-03-24 12:17 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-24 17:28 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-03-24 19:32 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-24 22:00 ` David Woodhouse
2005-03-25 8:18 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-24 21:59 ` David Woodhouse
2005-03-25 16:18 ` Sergei Sharonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4242AB96.8D95936D@st.com \
--to=estelle.hammache@st.com \
--cc=dedekind@yandex.ru \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox