From: Dan Brown <dan_brown@ieee.org>
To: Zeri Virgo <zerivirgo@infocell-its.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [UPDATE] DOCBoot support for NFTL-based DOC2000
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:13:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <424CAE31.8040302@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <424CA4EA.8090904@infocell-its.com>
Zeri Virgo wrote:
> > - How big is your firmware area? (I'm assuming you resized it using
> > the DOS-based tools)
> Well, I used dformat on a different chip as suggested, but that was with
> the unpatched kernel, so the chip probing failed (but didn't crash).
> I'm now using a fresh one - I didn't think I should _have_ to resize the
> firmware area first, should I? I'll try the patched kernel with a
> resized-firmware-area chip tomorrow....ZZZ
No, you're quite right. In fact, it's very useful for me to know that
the code crashes even when you don't have a resized firmware area.
Don't even bother trying it with a resized firmware tomorrow :)
> > - Did the diskonchip driver work for you without crashing before my
> > latest changes?
> Yes, I've been using 2.6.11.5 with the diskonchip driver compiled in -
> see first dmesg section below...
So is it correct to say that you've just switched from the diskonchip
driver which is distributed as part of 2.6.11.5, to the diskonchip
driver from the MTD CVS repository?
If so, then any of the changes between the MTD version in 2.6.11.5 and
the current CVS are potentially the problem, not just my latest change
to diskonchip.c
The version of diskonchip.c in 2.6.11.5 is 1.45. I don't see anything
in the changes between then and now (1.50) that should cause the
behavior you're seeing, which means either the problem is in a different
file or I'm just not seeing it :)
I'll stare at it some more tomorrow. Anyone else (Thomas?) have any
ideas where to look?
> Sorry I haven't offered any real help on this!
>
> - Zeri
On the contrary, you're much better at providing the right information
than most people.
-Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-01 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-29 21:06 [UPDATE] DOCBoot support for NFTL-based DOC2000 Dan Brown
2005-03-31 15:50 ` Zeri Virgo
2005-03-31 20:35 ` Dan Brown
2005-04-01 1:33 ` Zeri Virgo
2005-04-01 2:13 ` Dan Brown [this message]
2005-04-04 15:05 ` Zeri Virgo
2005-04-04 18:04 ` Dan Brown
2005-04-05 12:00 ` Zeri Virgo
2005-04-05 19:51 ` Dan Brown
2005-04-06 12:13 ` Zeri Virgo
2005-04-06 12:29 ` Zeri Virgo
2005-04-06 13:12 ` Dan Brown
2005-04-06 14:48 ` Zeri Virgo
2005-04-06 16:29 ` Dan Brown
2005-04-06 18:23 ` Dan Brown
2005-04-07 14:27 ` Dan Brown
2005-04-07 21:45 ` Zeri Virgo
2005-04-08 15:41 ` Dan Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=424CAE31.8040302@ieee.org \
--to=dan_brown@ieee.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=zerivirgo@infocell-its.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox