* Nand Flash not found.
@ 2005-04-14 9:29 Marcus Mikolaiczyk
2005-04-14 10:11 ` William J Beksi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marcus Mikolaiczyk @ 2005-04-14 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
Dear list users,
I've adapted a hardware driver for our board, and compiled the new
kernel successfully. But it doesn't find the NAND Flash. When loading
the module I get:
insmod ./btutc1130.o
./btutc1130.o: init_module: No such device or address
Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters,
including invalid IO or IRQ parameters
in /var/log/messages:
Jan 1 19:25:15 10 daemon.warn klogd: No NAND device found!!!
Is there any possibility to test the 'connection' to the NAND or how can
I check/debug the problem. I think that the HW functions are not
properly configured, any idea how this can be checked.
Thanks in advance
Marcus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Nand Flash not found.
2005-04-14 9:29 Nand Flash not found Marcus Mikolaiczyk
@ 2005-04-14 10:11 ` William J Beksi
2005-04-14 10:27 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: William J Beksi @ 2005-04-14 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: m.mikolaiczyk; +Cc: linux-mtd
Hi Marcus,
Marcus Mikolaiczyk wrote:
> Dear list users,
>
> I've adapted a hardware driver for our board, and compiled the new
> kernel successfully. But it doesn't find the NAND Flash. When loading
> the module I get:
> insmod ./btutc1130.o
> ./btutc1130.o: init_module: No such device or address
> Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters,
> including invalid IO or IRQ parameters
>
> in /var/log/messages:
> Jan 1 19:25:15 10 daemon.warn klogd: No NAND device found!!!
>
> Is there any possibility to test the 'connection' to the NAND or how can
> I check/debug the problem. I think that the HW functions are not
> properly configured, any idea how this can be checked.
I often have this problem if I don't have a good physical connection
between the flash device and it's socket, so recheck your connection.
Can you post your hardware function?
--
William J Beksi <wjbeksi@users.sourceforge.net>
GPG Key Fingerprint = ED4B 32C3 69E6 C2B7 705C 263F CB2F 3253 E7E1 DB3B
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Nand Flash not found.
2005-04-14 10:11 ` William J Beksi
@ 2005-04-14 10:27 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
2005-05-06 9:52 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marcus Mikolaiczyk @ 2005-04-14 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William J Beksi; +Cc: linux-mtd
Hi William,
the connection should be ok, the hardware guys tested it - I hope so.
They use a simple test appl. which I cannot use under Linux.
the hardware function (discussion "NAND connected with address lines
based example" on this list around 31.03.2005):
...
static int BTU_NAND_BASE = 0xAE000000;
static int BTU_NAND_VIRT_BASE ;
static int BTU_NAND_RB = 0xF0000C00;
static int BTU_NAND_RB_RDY = (1<<5);
/*
* Define partitions for flash devices
*/
extern struct nand_oobinfo jffs2_oobinfo;
#define NUM_PARTITIONS256M 1
static struct mtd_partition partition_info256M[] = {
{ name: "BTU NAND flash partition 1",
offset: 0,
size: SZ_256M },
};
/*
* hardware specific access to control-lines via address bus
*/
static void btutc1130_hwcontrol(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd)
{
struct nand_chip *this = (struct nand_chip *) mtd->priv;
switch(cmd){
//Command Latch Enable Settings
case NAND_CTL_SETCLE: this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE +
1; break;
case NAND_CTL_CLRCLE: this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE;
break;
//Address Latch Enable Settings
case NAND_CTL_SETALE: this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE +
2; break;
case NAND_CTL_CLRALE: this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE;
break;
}
}
/*
* read device ready pin
*/
int btutc1130_device_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
// Gibt 0 zurueck, wenn P0.4_IN 0 ist ansonsten 1
return ( (*(volatile unsigned char *) (BTU_NAND_RB + 0x14)) &
BTU_NAND_RB_RDY) ? 1 : 0;
}
....
....
I've got a seperate CS which is connect to the nand an too this CS the
address range 0xAE000000 is 'connected'.
I'm looking for to write a small c-appl which does some inital tests on
this.
Marcus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Nand Flash not found.
2005-04-14 10:27 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
@ 2005-05-06 9:52 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
2005-05-06 12:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marcus Mikolaiczyk @ 2005-05-06 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: m.mikolaiczyk; +Cc: linux-mtd
Hi,
I'm still on the way getting the Samsung NAND discovered, but a small
step has been made.
I've got now a simple testapplication which can read out the NAND IDs
with the readid cmd 0x90 . So I can definitely discover this NAND chip
with this Linux app, but not with the 'derived' linux NAND driver.
Samsung K9F2G08UOM:
Page Size: 2k (+64) Bytes
Block Size: 128k (+4k) Bytes
Organisation: 8 Bit
Code example for external READID cmd:
#define NANDF_DATA (*((unsigned int volatile *) 0xAE000000))
#define NANDF_COMM (*((unsigned int volatile *) 0xAE000004))
#define NANDF_ADDR (*((unsigned int volatile *) 0xAE000008))
...
value=0x90;
NANDF_COMM=value;
value=0x00; // not necessary
NANDF_ADDR=value;
va[0]=NANDF_DATA;
va[1]=NANDF_DATA;
va[2]=NANDF_DATA;
va[3]=NANDF_DATA;
printf("Maker Code: %x Device Type: %x DontCare: %x
Organisation: %x\n\r", va[0], va[1], va[2], v
a[3]);
...
Results:
Maker Code: ec Device Type: da DontCare: 80 Organisation: 15
SAMSUNG 3.3V See Above Values for Pages Size...
I changed the hardwarespecific part to this values but with no success.
The module does not find the NAND.
static int BTU_NAND_BASE = 0xAE000000;
static int BTU_NAND_VIRT_BASE ;
static int BTU_NAND_RB = 0xF0000C00;
static int BTU_NAND_RB_RDY = (1<<5);
...
static void btutc1130_hwcontrol(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd)
{
struct nand_chip *this = (struct nand_chip *) mtd->priv;
switch(cmd){
//Command Latch Enable Settings
case NAND_CTL_SETCLE: this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE + 4; break;
case NAND_CTL_CLRCLE: this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE; break;
//Address Latch Enable Settings
case NAND_CTL_SETALE: this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE + 8; break;
case NAND_CTL_CLRALE: this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE; break;
}
}
...
/* map physical adress */
BTU_NAND_VIRT_BASE=(unsigned long)ioremap(BTU_NAND_BASE,SZ_4K);
...
/* Set address of NAND IO lines */
this->IO_ADDR_R = BTU_NAND_BASE;
this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE;
this->hwcontrol = btutc1130_hwcontrol;
this->dev_ready = btutc1130_device_ready;
/* 20 us command delay time */
this->chip_delay = 20;
this->eccmode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
...
What does the nand_scan function check ?
What else should be adapted (Chip ID list in nand_ids.c)?
Someone any ideas.
Cheers Marcus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Nand Flash not found.
2005-05-06 9:52 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
@ 2005-05-06 12:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-05-06 13:35 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2005-05-06 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: m.mikolaiczyk; +Cc: linux-mtd
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 11:52 +0200, Marcus Mikolaiczyk wrote:
> value=0x90;
....
> va[3]=NANDF_DATA;
The code in nand_scan does exactly the same
> Results:
> Maker Code: ec Device Type: da
{"NAND 256MiB 3,3V 8-bit", 0xDA, 0, 256, 0, ..
Thats the entry from nand_ids.c
> static int BTU_NAND_BASE = 0xAE000000;
> BTU_NAND_VIRT_BASE=(unsigned long)ioremap(BTU_NAND_BASE,SZ_4K);
> this->IO_ADDR_R = BTU_NAND_BASE;
> this->IO_ADDR_W = BTU_NAND_BASE;
-------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Using the virtual address instead of the physical address might be
helpful.
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Nand Flash not found.
2005-05-06 12:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2005-05-06 13:35 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marcus Mikolaiczyk @ 2005-05-06 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx; +Cc: linux-mtd
> {"NAND 256MiB 3,3V 8-bit", 0xDA, 0, 256, 0, ..
>
> Thats the entry from nand_ids.c
Thats related to the actual version. I know that it's not supported
anymore, but I have to use kernel 2.4.19 cause the Linux for this
microcontroller (Infineon tc1130) is ported only this kernel version.
Comparing those structs there is a difference.
I didn't find the latest patch 2.4.27. The link on the website doesn't
work cause the file doesn't exist:
ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/people/dwmw2/mtd/cvs/mtd-snapshot-20050304.tar.bz2
I suppose a type cause ther is a file
ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/people/dwmw2/mtd/cvs/mtd-snapshot-20050403.tar.bz2
I'll try this one.
for the old structure I would propose something like:
{"NAND 256MiB 3,3V 8-bit", 0xDA, 0, 0x20000, 0),
erasesize=128K =0x20000
pagesize=0 (device pagesize = 2k != 256bytes)
chipshift???
Any mappings between the "new - old" structure which could help?
new - old
-------------------
name - name
id - id
pagesize- ?
chipsize- ?
? - chipshift
erasesize- erasesize
? - page256
options - ?
> Using the virtual address instead of the physical address might be
> helpful.
Sorry - my mistake.
Thanks Marcus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-06 13:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-14 9:29 Nand Flash not found Marcus Mikolaiczyk
2005-04-14 10:11 ` William J Beksi
2005-04-14 10:27 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
2005-05-06 9:52 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
2005-05-06 12:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-05-06 13:35 ` Marcus Mikolaiczyk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox