From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cipe.mpl.ch ([195.134.130.77] helo=mail.mpl.ch) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Daqpy-0006fc-RD for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 04:02:02 -0400 Message-ID: <429430FA.1080006@elsoft.ch> Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 10:02:02 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22David_M=FCller_=28ELSOFT_AG=29=22?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= References: <429320D1.2060003@elsoft.ch> <20050524145511.GA24361@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20050524145511.GA24361@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: JFFS2 access delay List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello J=F6rn Engel wrote: > Works as designed. If this behaviour is not desired, it's about time > for a redesign... >=20 > ...which will come within 12 month. Just not today, so you have to=20 > live with jffs2 for some time. Do you know if JFFS3 or Yaffs show a similar behaviour? Dave