From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.170.72.194] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Dar2O-00079k-UI for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 04:14:50 -0400 Message-ID: <429433EF.2050308@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 12:14:39 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=22David_M=FCller_=28ELSOFT_AG=29=22?= References: <429320D1.2060003@elsoft.ch> <1116944005.16577.23.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> <429430F1.2080208@elsoft.ch> In-Reply-To: <429430F1.2080208@elsoft.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: JFFS2 access delay List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David M=FCller (ELSOFT AG) wrote: > The JFFS2 partition has 126MiB, the whole NAND flash has a size of 128M= iB. The problem with JFFS2 is that is does not scale. 126 MiB is very large=20 partition for it. Read=20 http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/tech/JFFS3design/node3.html for more=20 details. JFFS2 was designed for small flashes and works perfectly with th= em. BTW, the flash file system for Large-scale flashes is rather challenging = task. --=20 Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.