From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.170.72.194] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DiAqW-0004gr-Is for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:48:49 -0400 Message-ID: <42AED208.70002@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:48:08 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Sharonov References: <004d01c57074$ad3758d0$6702a8c0@niro> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: suggestion on use of linux-mtd List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sergei Sharonov wrote: > I am also interested in power fail tolerance of ext3 but could not find > any test data. People mentioned that it should be better then other > journaling filesystem (such as reserfs, jfs, xfs) because of different > journaling scheme. > Hi Sergey, BTW, I remember you were needing atomicity. Reiser4 supports that. It supports start transaction/commit semantic, although there is no such syscall in Linux (yet). Nevertheless, Reiser4 is not stable yet. -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.