From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fmr14.intel.com ([192.55.52.68] helo=fmsfmr002.fm.intel.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Din4h-0005iu-Mf for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:38:00 -0400 Message-ID: <42B11054.4020509@intel.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:38:28 +0800 From: zhao MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse References: <8126E4F969BA254AB43EA03C59F44E840263CEAE@pdsmsx404> <1118827313.22181.52.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1118827313.22181.52.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb18030; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: jffs2 corrupt rarely, how to fix it? List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 17:19 +0800, Zhao, Forrest wrote: > >> Would you please give me some information about the difference >> between the JFFS2 in 2.4 kernel and the one in 2.6 kernel? > > > Not until you read http://david.woodhou.se/email.html > Ask your question again without violating common netiquette and I'll > answer it. > Hi, David Would you please give me some information about the difference between the JFFS2 in 2.4 kernel and the one in 2.6 kernel? Will the enhancement and new features of JFFS2 in 2.6 kernel be back-ported to 2.4 kernel? Hope I comply with the netiquette this time :) Thanks, Forrest