From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DvwPE-0003yG-3c for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 08:13:38 -0400 Message-ID: <42E0E2C8.7090304@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:12:56 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zhao_fusheng@hotmail.com References: <20050722115939.GA941@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20050722115939.GA941@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH]fs/jffs2/wbuf.c: add compatibility support for OOB data block List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , J=F6rn Engel wrote: >=20 > Sevenfold indentation is not what I call good coding style. Try to > make this stuff simpler. Use "if (!...) continue" and similar > constructs. >=20 Agree, although it is how JFFS2 is written. Let's not worsen it, but=20 instead, make it tidier. Please, if you don't mind, reformat the whole=20 function, you may split it on shorter sub-functions, etc. BTW, IMO the Summary patch of Ferenc Havasi is not yet in CVS (even=20 though it greatly helps with mount time) because he didn't bothered=20 making it cute. He just took messy JFFS2 code, and made it even messier. = I'd be glad to see Ferenc's patch nice and in CVS. --=20 Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.