From: Todd Poynor <tpoynor@mvista.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: xip changes between 2.6.11 and 20050530?
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:02:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42EA8B3F.3040403@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050729065012.GA8186@ku-gbr.de>
Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
> To be sure:
> Any xip_* function only calls functions marked __xipram (which are
> located in RAM then hopefully also) and only __xipram marked functions
> call functions located still in flash?
Nico's comments in cfi_cmdset_0001.c describe it better than I did:
* No interrupt what so ever can be serviced while the flash isn't in array
* mode. This is ensured by the xip_disable() and xip_enable() functions
* enclosing any code path where the flash is known not to be in array
mode.
* And within a XIP disabled code path, only functions marked with __xipram
* may be called and nothing else (it's a good thing to inspect generated
* assembly to make sure inline functions were actually inlined and
that gcc
* didn't emit calls to its own support functions). Also configuring
MTD CFI
* support to a single buswidth and a single interleave is also
recommended.
The reason for "single buswidth and a single interleave" is to avoid
division operations to compute various things driven by those two
parameters, which will probably call a library function placed by
default in flash to do the divide; if a single buswidth and interleave
is configured then the derived values are compiled as constants and need
not be computed at runtime.
Yes, it's all a little delicate. ;)
--
Todd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-29 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-06 14:45 xip changes between 2.6.11 and 20050530? Konstantin Kletschke
2005-07-06 16:44 ` Todd Poynor
2005-07-07 8:22 ` Konstantin Kletschke
2005-07-07 12:33 ` Konstantin Kletschke
2005-07-28 12:17 ` Konstantin Kletschke
2005-07-28 12:39 ` Konstantin Kletschke
2005-07-28 15:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-07-28 18:07 ` Konstantin Kletschke
2005-07-28 18:15 ` Todd Poynor
2005-07-29 6:50 ` Konstantin Kletschke
2005-07-29 20:02 ` Todd Poynor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42EA8B3F.3040403@mvista.com \
--to=tpoynor@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox