From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.16]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1E2mMH-0008KM-G5 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 04:54:52 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO deepspace9.in2soft.meep) (547986@[84.153.62.54]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Aug 2005 08:48:04 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.141] (linux-og [192.168.0.141]) by deepspace9.in2soft.meep (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C09B0 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:47:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42F9BF5F.7060603@prie.de> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:48:31 +0200 From: Bernhard Priewasser MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org References: <42F9BA34.6090008@prie.de> <20050810083828.GA16583@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20050810083828.GA16583@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Compiling JFFS3 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jörn Engel wrote: > That's expected. JFFS3 was an attempt that didn't work out. Unless > you are willing to spend several month of full time on the project, > just forget about it and use JFFS2 instead. > > I guess we should remove that whole tree soon, before more people are > getting confused. Oh... seems I'm not up to date about the JFFS2/3/... ongoing, sorry. I thought JFFS3 was intended basically containing Artem's improvements. So what about "future" issues like scaling on large flashes and the other nice JFFS3 stuff? Bernhard