From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.209.228.254] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1E2mPB-0008WU-R0 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 04:57:50 -0400 Message-ID: <42F9C158.3090406@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:56:56 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= References: <42F9BA34.6090008@prie.de> <20050810083828.GA16583@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20050810083828.GA16583@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Bernhard Priewasser , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Compiling JFFS3 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , J=F6rn Engel wrote: > That's expected. JFFS3 was an attempt that didn't work out. Unless > you are willing to spend several month of full time on the project, > just forget about it and use JFFS2 instead. >=20 > I guess we should remove that whole tree soon, before more people are > getting confused. >=20 Yeah, the jffs3 tree under MTD CVS is the first attempt to improve=20 JFFS2. Now it should be removed. --=20 Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.