Re: Compiling JFFS3

Bernhard Priewasser
2005-08-10T08:54:52Z

Jörn Engel wrote:
> That's expected. JFFS3 was an attempt that didn't work out. Unless
> you are willing to spend several month of full time on the project,
> just forget about it and use JFFS2 instead.
>
> I guess we should remove that whole tree soon, before more people are
> getting confused.

Oh... seems I'm not up to date about the JFFS2/3/... ongoing, sorry.
I thought JFFS3 was intended basically containing Artem's improvements.
So what about "future" issues like scaling on large flashes and the
other nice JFFS3 stuff?

Bernhard