From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.15]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1E2nwj-0003cK-99 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:36:51 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO deepspace9.in2soft.meep) (547986@[84.153.62.54]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Aug 2005 10:36:27 -0000 Message-ID: <42F9D8C5.9060008@prie.de> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:36:53 +0200 From: Bernhard Priewasser MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= References: <42F9BA34.6090008@prie.de> <20050810083828.GA16583@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <42F9BF5F.7060603@prie.de> <42F9C28D.4070206@yandex.ru> <42F9C4AF.6030505@prie.de> <42F9C612.2050301@yandex.ru> <42F9C980.7030301@prie.de> <20050810100557.GA18149@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> In-Reply-To: <20050810100557.GA18149@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Compiling JFFS3 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jörn Engel wrote: > Please always reply to all. I hate to miss interesting stuff, just > because some idiot removed me from the Cc: list. Better now? ;-) > The next flash FS, whatever it will look like, will not be log > structure anymore. At least, noone I know of is trying to follow that > road anymore. Log-structuring simply doesn't scale. But log-structuring and handling failsafe issues works comfortable and reliable... What's another solution, in matters of (a) robustness and (b) scaling? Bernhard