From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [213.170.72.194] (helo=shelob.oktetlabs.ru) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1E788y-0005DB-WC for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 04:59:05 -0400 Message-ID: <430993B1.5010502@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:58:25 +0400 From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Havasi References: <43098213.1020807@prie.de> <43099109.3050609@inf.u-szeged.hu> In-Reply-To: <43099109.3050609@inf.u-szeged.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bernhard Priewasser , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Testing JFFS2 using mtdram List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Ferenc Havasi wrote: > mtdram emulates NOR flash (both read and write operations), but does not > emulate delays. You can test stability with it, but for performance I > suggest Artem's nand simulator. It's included in the official MTD. It > can emulate delays and ceratinly you can test the NAND functionalities > of JFFS2, too. Albeit you cannot emulate > 128 MB flashes (just because 128 MB is the vmalloc()'s limit). This may be fixed, I just did not bother. And I never used that delays, just added them to make nandsim look cooler (kidding) :-) -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia.