From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.16]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EATTf-0004nw-0e for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:22:19 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO deepspace9.in2soft.meep) (547986@[84.153.94.177]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 31 Aug 2005 14:22:09 -0000 Message-ID: <4315BD10.80209@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:22:08 +0200 From: Bernhard Priewasser MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kyungmin.park@samsung.com References: <0ILN0001CYIA6E@mmp1.samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <0ILN0001CYIA6E@mmp1.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] OneNAND: Update OMAP OneNAND mapping using device driver model List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Kyungmin, what are the advantages in opposite to the existing way, e.g. (why) shall I use it for "porting" the OneNAND stuff to another board? Regards, Bernhard